Skip to content | Skip to main menu | Go to access key definitions page
 

LinkedIn’s Redesign Employs International SEO FAIL

Posted by Joanna Butler on 7th November 2009 to SEO

LinkedIn LogoSo LinkedIn’s had a redesign. In addition to a new minimalist look and feel that utilises more viewing space, they have balanced this positive step forward with a definite ‘two steps back’ approach by deciding to add profile URLs that include a country-specific subdomain.

Here’s what I mean. My old profile URL, which still works, is: http://www.linkedin.com/in/joannabutler

However, this is now appearing on profiles as the following:

http://uk.linkedin.com/in/joannabutler

Not only this, but other country codes are also working as @danbarker noticed:

All the above URLs have not been blocked through either robots.txt or a robots Meta tag. Only the canonical tag has been used on all URLs, except the ‘www’ and ‘home’ country. The tag specifies the ‘home’ country as the main URL as follows:

LinkedIn Rel Canonical Tag

As Michael Gray eloquently put it, these tags are like an SEO band-aid and entrusting your entire site and its duplicate content issues with a single tag is a little risky, if not foolish should the effect of these tags change overnight. It is much better to choose one URL and 301 redirect all to it, or at least to use some simple pattern matching in the robots.txt file to block search engines from the duplicate URLs. Failing that, implementing a ‘noindex’ robots Meta tag would help avoid issues.

But, as it currently stands, there are two URLs per profile: ‘www’ and ‘UK’ for me.

So, what are the SEO implications for LinkedIn profiles?

Duplicate content

Besides the fact having two URLs makes absolutely no sense, users are left wondering which URL is their ‘real’ profile and therefore which to link to. Two URLs could potentially mean half the number of inbound links as they’re split between profiles, and therefore link equity, reducing it’s authority.

Rebuilding your ego SERP

If LinkedIn axed the old URLs without 301 redirects, you will probably have to rebuild that equity for your new profile URL. The link to your nicely formatted career summary in the form of your LinkedIn profile page may well disappear out of your ego SERP.

International reach

UK SERPs If you are based in the UK, want to connect with people in the UK, and don’t ever consider moving countries, this update is for you! However, in today’s well-connected, online society this is highly unlikely. You are far more likely to fall into one or more of the following categories:

  • You work for an international company
  • You need to connect to people around the world
  • You may emmigrate

Therefore, you will prefer to keep the original, location-independent URL.

Complex URLs

Already there appears to be a redundant ‘in’ directory within profile URLs, but now we have to remember what country a person resides in in order to reference them.

What benefits are there, if any, of a country subdomain?

Local search

Your profile may well rank better in local searches. That is to say if someone searches for me in the UK, my UK profile should rank better than if they were searching from the US. [However, this may not be true due to the well publicised issues with the UK SERPs recently receiving unnaturally large amounts of foreign websites in local searches, but that's a whole other topic!]

Interestingly, LinkedIn haven’t changed the ‘lang’ attribute in the HTML or employed international language changes such as using ‘resume’ in US profiles and ‘CV’ in UK profiles.

In conclusion: this is a LinkedIn #FAIL

It makes absolutely no sense to adopt this new URL structure from an SEO, usability or recruitment/business standpoint. The only possible reasons they could be opting for this format are to free up more usernames or for unknown technical reasons.

It will be interesting to see what happens to LinkedIn profiles in SERPs over the coming days and weeks. If you have any insights or opinions on this, drop me a comment as I’d love to hear them. Let’s hope you haven’t had any expensive business cards etc. printed with your LinkedIn profile URL on…


11 comments


  1. LinkedIn’s Redesign Employs International SEO FAIL | SEO Article Expert said:

    [...] Read more: LinkedIn’s Redesign Employs International SEO FAIL [...]

  2. Tweets that mention LinkedIn Profile URL Country Subdomains | Search Engine Chocolate -- Topsy.com said:

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Martin Goode, Joanna Butler. Joanna Butler said: LinkedIn's redesign employs international SEO FAIL: http://j.mp/LinkedInURLs #LinkedIn #SEO #fail – Search Engine Chocolate [...]

  3. uberVU - social comments said:

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by JoannaButler: LinkedIn’s redesign employs international SEO FAIL: http://j.mp/LinkedInURLs #LinkedIn #SEO #fail – Search Engine Chocolate…

  4. Linkedin makes a change to Geo specific public profile URLS | Cloud Mixer - Mixing New Media Ideas said:

    [...] regarding a change in the Linkedin Public Profile URL I checked out the post he linked to on Search Engine Chocolate and began my usually 10 minutes of head scratching and wondering what the hell was going [...]

  5. Nichola Stott said:

    Great post Joanna. I’d noticed the cosmetic changes but hadn’t looked in much detail at anything else. You are dead right. My ‘public profile’ URL now defaults to the UK sub-domain.

    I cannot think of what the objective must have been for this particular change, so tend to agree with you that there could be a user name or unknown tech issue at play.

    Would hope someone from Linkedin will speak out soon as to any intentions with the original www.

    Hmmm….

  6. dan barker said:

    hi, Joanna, how’s life?

    I don’t think they’ve made the best job of this, but what they seem to be trying to do is actually pretty clever. Here’s what I think they’re aiming for:

    1. Split up their users into country buckets. (done, albeit slightly clunky)
    2. Build a search-engine-facing link structure for each country. (partway there – see the local ‘browse by country’ they’re showing on the subdomains)
    3. Separate off those subdomains & push for them to get into local versions of search engines (only just started)
    4. Implement local homepages, automatic local language assumption, etc. (very vageuly started)

    WHY WOULD THEY DO ALL OF THIS?

    Linkedin is very US centric. The easiest way for them to grow is to expand outside the US, where they’re far less saturated. Their entire search strategy is ‘rank for peoples names’ & they miss an enormous chunk of that by not appearing in ‘pages from the UK’, ‘pages in Germany’, ‘pages in the German language’, etc.

    While they haven’t got things quite right so far (eg. try http://hk.linkedin.com/directory/people/d.html ), it’s a good idea & could work very well for them.

    Any thoughts?

    dan

  7. SEO Doctor said:

    I only just noticed this when I viewed my own profile – after some nice link building to the old url. Still cannot work out if those profile links are dofollow – they never appear in any link data.

  8. Rudolf said:

    Joanna,

    Thanks for bringing up this topic.

    Slightly off-topic, maybe:

    How about “duplicate content” issues if one would enter exactly the same profile content in other professional social networking sites like Xing, and ending up with profile pages (linkedIn, Xing, etc.) having largely identical content? I guess headings will be different but body text will be identical.

    Would there be negative effects on the indexing results by the robots?

  9. Dennis Hollingworth said:

    Wow, well spotted Joanna! I’m hands-up for not doing until you pointed it out.
    Do you know the ‘why’ they’ve done it?

  10. Jamil Kassam said:

    Not to mention the actual usability of the site was much better before the redesign in my opinion.

  11. g1smd said:

    Ferchristssake it’s 2011. Why is this crap still happening?

    1998 just called and wants the LinkedIn devs back home.